![]() ![]() Makes you wonder, what good is such Q&A for and what ELSE is wrong… In other words, Quasar is pulling answers out of his ass, without checking with Minsk central. ![]() If you don’t believe me, Vallter has a blog, you can doublecheck the answers there. Those, who follow my RU translation know both of these options were denied specifically by SerB and Storm, that’s why I went and asked Russian developer Vallter directly (this post is made with his knowledge). Any update regarding more options for customizing the exterior of our tanks?Īlso at this moment in time, we are also working on projects of the rings for the gun barrels:Įdit: a screenie, because at some point it will probably get backedited, as it did in the Panzer 58 case. Not at all, but it has a very low priority for the moment.Ħ5. Was the idea of the female crew completely abandoned? What I did was I asked Edrard (the wot-news guy), who relayed this question to Veider (RU forums developer), who confirmed they have a high chance of coming in the EU tree. Some of you might remember that some time ago, Quasar posted that Panzer 58 and other Swiss tanks won’t be implemented, while the Russian developers said they would. Nothing wrong with that, the problem is, he occasionally posts bullshit. For those, who don’t know him, Quasar is the EU server “developer/producer”, who occasionally posts some answers to some questions. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |